Criminal law vs civil law attorneys
The standard of proof that is required in criminal and civil cases differs, although in both cases the burden of proof is on the plaintiff. The plaintiff or the person who wants to file a lawsuit will be required to present the court with a sufficient amount of evidence, in order to prove that the defendant is guilty. However, as mentioned above, the main difference is in the level of proof that is required in each case. There are many criminal law vs civil law articles which you can refer to, which can provide insights into this.
Standard of proof in a civil case
Civil cases, as you would expect, deal with financial liabilities for the defendants, and as such, the burden of proof on the plaintiff’s lawyer is much less as compared to a criminal case counterpart. The attorney of the plaintiff just has to provide enough evidence to suggest that the defendant causing an injury to the plaintiff is a more likely scenario. If the attorney is able to prove that there such an outcome is possible, then the defendant will lose the lawsuit.
Standard of proof in a criminal case
In a criminal lawsuit, the prosecutor must meet the standard of proof, which is referred to as “beyond reasonable doubt”. It is quite clear from this standard of proof that a prosecutor has a much bigger task in his hands. This is because; he will have to make sure that the evidence produced in the court is so convincing that the members of the jury can reach only one logical conclusion; that the defendant is guilty of the alleged crimes. The prosecutor has a higher burden of proof than a civil case attorney, simply because in a criminal case, the freedom of the defendant is at stake.
Criminal law vs civil law explained
In both of these criminal law vs civil law scenarios, one thing is clear as far as the standard of proof is concerned: whenever the freedom of a person is at stake, the court will be required to be convinced of his guilt beyond any reasonable doubt. This is quite apparent when the prosecutor has to convince the members of the jury that there is no other logical explanation other than the one outlined by him.
This is some information on the standard of proof required to win Civil and Criminal cases. Further information on this can be availed from online legal resources.